SEO Google

Analiza po update Jagger w Google

Trafi�em na ciekw� analiz� kt�ra wskazuje na co zwraca�o uwage google w trakcie ostatniego update Jagger.Jakie czynniki wp�yn�y na obni�enie pozycji.Duplication of content in same site or several. This includes affiliated content. Penalty.Cross-linking or I connect common to all site (typically in the foot of the common page). Penalty.Changes in the value of the proximity of the words.Value of the incoming connections (incoming links)Repetition or abuse of key words (Keyword stuffing)Value of the anchor text of the incoming connectionsContent in the page of the incoming connections.Repetitions of key words in the anchor.Age of the incoming connections.Type of sites that connect to you (Hilltop).Speed and volume of obtained incoming connections.Value of the reciprocal connections.Impact of the salient connections/pages of connection in your Web.Sandbox or filter of age of the dominion.Amount of content.Speed and unique frequency contained again.Problems of canonicalMany dominions in an IP or a class C.Sobreoptimizaci�n or you practice not allowed.Increase of importance of documents pdf.- wybaczcie �e z translatora, ale nie chcia�o mi sie t�umaczy� :) wi�cej faktor�w jest

Trafi�em na ciekw� analiz� kt�ra wskazuje na co zwraca�o uwage google w trakcie ostatniego update Jagger.

Jakie czynniki wp�yn�y na obni�enie pozycji.

Duplication of content in same site or several. This includes affiliated content. Penalty.
Cross-linking or I connect common to all site (typically in the foot of the common page). Penalty.
Changes in the value of the proximity of the words.
Value of the incoming connections (incoming links)
Repetition or abuse of key words (Keyword stuffing)
Value of the anchor text of the incoming connections
Content in the page of the incoming connections.
Repetitions of key words in the anchor.
Age of the incoming connections.
Type of sites that connect to you (Hilltop).
Speed and volume of obtained incoming connections.
Value of the reciprocal connections.
Impact of the salient connections/pages of connection in your Web.
Sandbox or filter of age of the dominion.
Amount of content.
Speed and unique frequency contained again.
Problems of canonical
Many dominions in an IP or a class C.
Sobreoptimizaci�n or you practice not allowed.
Increase of importance of documents pdf.

– wybaczcie �e z translatora, ale nie chcia�o mi sie t�umaczy� :) wi�cej faktor�w jest tu

I jeszcze w zwi�zku ze spekulacjami na temat trust ranku, co i jak mo�e google ocenia�:

gov – authority. can be edited only by authority, thus hard to spam.

edu – semi-authority. sometimes edited by students that might not be as knowledgable as gov editors. Also contain lot’s of student pages. Still good quality and quality control eforced by universities.

org – still mainly used for organizations, thus being a semi-authority. There is less spam on orgs.

A to już wiesz?  Matt Cutts z Google i Jeremy Zawodny

net – higher than com simply because com is more mainstream and com attracts more crap sites.

com – see net

za webmasterworld.com

Artykuly o tym samym temacie, podobne tematy